Opto-electromechanically induced transparency in a hybrid opto-electromechanical system
Liu Hui1, Qin Li-Guo2, 3, †, Tian Li-Jun1, ‡, Ma Hong-Yang4
Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
School of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China
School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266000, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lgqin@foxmail.com tianlijun@shu.edu.cn

Abstract
Abstract

We study opto-electromechanically induced transparency in a hybrid opto-electromechanical system made up of an optical cavity tunneling-coupled to an opto-mechanical cavity, which is capacitively coupled to a charged mechanical oscillator by a charged and moveable mechanical cavity mirror as an interface. By studying the effects of the different parameters on the output field, we propose a scheme to modulate the opto-electromechanically induced transparency (OEMIT). Our results show that the OEMIT with the transparency windows from single to double to triple can be modulated by changing the tunneling, opto-mechanical and electrical couplings. In addition, the explanation of the OEMIT with multi-windows is given by the energy level diagram based on quantum interference. Our investigation will provide an optimal platform to manipulate the transmission of optical field via microfabricated opto-electromechanical device.

1. Introduction

Over the past two decades cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) has the blooming developments and become one of the most promising setups to investigate the interactions between light and matter at the quantum level.[1, 2] The progress has shown that cavity QED offers an interesting tool to implement quantum manipulation technology. For example, cavity-induced transparency[3] is an electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT)-like effect.[4] The EIT-like effect provided large valuable contributions and important roles in a variety of quantum processes, such as nonlinear susceptibility modulation,[5] light switch,[6] quantum memory,[7] and quantum communication.[8]

As a novel extension of the cavity, cavity opto-mechanics system is usually composed of Fabry–Pérot (FP) cavity with one fixed mirror replaced by a mechanical oscillator as a movable mirror, where the optical field in the cavity can couple to the mechanical oscillator via the radiation pressure.[9] Recently such cavity opto-mechanics has become one of the most promising platform to study the interactions between optical and mechanical modes or between optical fields and atoms, and has attracted increasing interest in both theory and experiment.[9, 10] More importantly, some theories in QED can be further extended to the cavity opto-mechanics,[10] where many interesting phenomena and effects have been theoretically predicted then experimentally demonstrated, such as opto-mechanically induced transparency (OMIT, EIT-like),[1113] frequency transfer,[14] and normal-mode splitting.[15] In addition, this system can be applied to studying the cooling of mechanical oscillator,[16, 17] precision measurement,[1821] quantum information transfer,[22, 23] etc. When the combination of opto-mechanical system with atoms or the nitrogen–vacancy centers in various hybrid systems allows for light switch,[24] electro-optic waveform interconnect,[25] the strong coupling of the mechanical oscillations to the atomic spin[26] and phonon-induced spin–spin interactions.[27] Therefore cavity opto-mechanics system has shown significant advantages and may be applicable to future quantum networks.[10]

The transmission spectroscopy of the cavity is of crucial importance to control the propagation and absorption of optical field in practical application. Therefore, the output of cavity opto-mechanics is widely studied, especially the OMIT effect caused by the destructive interference.[28] However, the OMIT with a single transparency window in the frequency domain limits the manifold functionalities for nonlinear optics and optical communication.[10] In recent studies, the single-OMIT has been extended to the double transparency windows in the divers opto-mechanical modes. The double transparency can be induced by two charged nano-mechanical resonators with Coulomb interaction,[29] the coherent oscillations of the two mechanical oscillators,[30] two tunneling-coupled resonators,[31] two coupling opto-mechanical cavities,[32] and coupling the mechanical resonator to a two-level system.[33] Further, multiple-OMIT was also found in multiple-cavity opto-mechanical system coupled to one two-level atom.[34] It is worth noting that the multiple-OMIT in the nanostructure system can be applied in all-optical communication,[31] all optical quantum network, and multi-channel quantum information processing.[35] Therefore it is very valuable and significant to research the manipulation of the multiple-OMIT.

In order to break frequency limitation of the transparency window and realize multiple-channel optical communication,[10] this device should satisfy the following conditions: (i) the multiple transparent windows; (ii) controllable transparent windows; (iii) advantageous integrability on the chip. For this purpose we propose a scheme to manipulate the opto-electromechanically induced transparency (OEMIT) with multi-windows in a hybrid opto-electromechanical device consisted of two tunneling coupled cavities including one FP cavity and one opto-mechanical cavity. The charged mechanical mirror of the opto-mechanical cavity is capacitively coupled to another charged mechanical oscillator by the Coulomb interaction, i.e., a mechanically tunable capacitor. By combining the coherent cavity,[31] opto-mechanical,[11] and Coulomb couplings[29] into a micro-fabricated hybrid opto-electromechanical module, we successively show the single, double, and triple transparency windows, i.e., a controllable multiple-OMIT, whose width can be adjusted by changing the parameters of the system. Here the transparency is a hybrid opto-electromechanically induced transparency. This integrated device including functions of three of induced transparency will excite a development trend and implementation prospect towards the integration quantum module device.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the hybrid opto-electromechanical model and theoretical equations. We will discuss OEMIT in our system and propose a scheme to modulate the transparency windows of OEMIT in Section 3. Finally we give the conclusion.

2. Model and theory

The hybrid opto-electromechanical system (HOEMS) under consideration is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The system consists of an FP cavity tunneling-connected to a cavity opto-electromechanical system, which includes a typical opto-mehcanical cavity and a variable capacitor. As an interface, the nanomechanical oscillator (NMO) not only couples to the cavity field by the radiation pressure but also capacitively interacts with another mechanical oscillator by the Coulomb interaction. The FP cavity is separately driven by a strong pump field with frequency and a weak probe field with frequency . In the rotating frame, the total Hamiltonian of the HOEMS can be written as

where
where and with i=1,2 are annihilation operators of the i-th cavity and the i-th NMO with frequency and mass mi separately, ( ) is the detuning frequency between the i-th cavity field (the probe field) and the pump field respectively. H0 represents the free Hamiltonian of two optical cavities and two NMOs. denotes the interaction Hamiltonian of the system and successively describes the coherent photon tunneling coupling between the two cavity fields with tunneling-coupling strength J, the opto-mechanical coupling between the opto-mechanical cavity and the NMO through the radiation pressure with the opto-mechanical coupling parameter , the input–output coupling of the cavity field to the injected pump field with the amplitude and probe field with the amplitude , where are the powers of the pump and probe fields and are the decay rates of cavities , the Coulomb coupling between the two NMOs with the Coulomb coupling strength ,[29, 36] where the i-th NMO takes the charges (i=1,2) with the capacitance Ci and the voltage Vi of the bias gate, L is the equilibrium distance between two NMOs and is the vacuum permittivity.

Fig. 1. The schematic diagram of the HOEMS. The FP cavity is tunneling coupled to an opto-mechanical cavity , where the charged NMO as a mechanical mirror of the opto-mechanical cavity is capacitively coupled to another charged NMO by the Coulomb interaction. J is the tunneling coupling strength between the two cavities. The HOEMS is driven by a strong pump field and a weak probe field . The output field at the probe frequency of the HOEMS is .

Considering the effects of noise terms on the cavity fields and NMOs, the Langevin equations of the HOEMS are given by the following expressions[37]

where describe the damping rates of the mechanical modes , respectively. ( ) is the input noise operator with zero mean value. The quantum Brownian noise ( ) with zero mean value comes from the coupling between the NMO ( ) and its own environment. Therefore, the noise terms are negligible in the case of the mean response. Under the condition of mean field approximation with operator factorization , where and are two arbitrary operators,[11] the dynamic equations of the system can be written as
In order to simplify these nonlinear equations, we can take a semi-classical approach by considering , which allows us to write down each operator as a linear sum of the steady-state mean value and a small quantum fluctuation, i.e.,
Here the steady-state value of the operator comes from the influence of the strong pump light and the weak probe light causes the quantum fluctuation. After inserting Eq. (6) into Eq. (5), and neglecting the second-order terms, we can obtain the steady-state mean values of the system as
where is the effective detuning. The linear equations of quantum fluctuation are given by
where is the effective opto-mechanical coupling strength between the optical mode and the mechanical mode . For simplicity, we consider two identical NMOs with , , and , but it is not essential. In addition, we assume that the HOEMS is operating under the conditions of the resolved red sideband and , the NMOs with and .[31] Based on the rotating-wave approximation, with the rotation transform and , the steady-state equations of quantum fluctuation can be derived as
where is the effective detuning of the probe field from the cavity resonance frequency. Under steady-state condition, the solution of the first intracavity field can be given by

In order to find the response of the system to the probe frequency, by the output field based on the input–output theory,[11, 31] we can obtain

For the opto-electromechanically induced modification of the probe field in the HOEMS, we define the term as
The real and imaginary parts of describe the absorption and dispersion of the HOEMS, respectively.[11]

3. Opto-electromechanically induced transparency with tunable multi-transparency windows in output field

Now we present the opto-electromechanically induced multi-transparency in the HOEMS and study the manipulation of OEMIT in the different cases. We find that the number and width of the OEMIT windows can be modulated and some interesting phenomena can be observed. Here we employ the parameters from the recent experiment,[12, 31] where the mass m = 20 ng, the frequency , the damping rate , and the wavelength of the cavity field , and the power the pump laser and the single photon coupling strength .

If the tunneling-coupling strength between two cavity fields J = 0, i.e., the system only includes an FP cavity driven by the pump and probe fields, Figure 2(a) shows the usual absorption and dispersion of the optical field with no transparency window. The output field becomes , which only depends the first cavity decay and the detuning .

Fig. 2. The absorption Re (blue-solid line) and dispersion Im (red-dotted line) as a function of the detuning with no opto-mechanical coupling g = 0 in the different cases (a) , J = 0; (b) , (c) , (d) , .

When the opto-mechanical coupling g is negligible with in Eq. (10), the output field can be rewritten as

which has the standard form of the single coupled-cavity-induced transparency.[38] As the coupling strength J gradually increases, the absorption peak of the probe field in Fig. 2(a) begins to split into two peaks, i.e., a dip appears and finally reaches a state with no absorption. From Figs. 2(b) and 2(c), we can find that the transparency window can be widened and the dip can be deepened by the strong coupling J when the other parameters are not changed. If the decay of the second cavity decreases, i.e., the quality of the coupling cavity becomes high, the dip can be also deepened, as shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(d). These show that the single-transparency window is induced by the strong coupling cavity field.

Further considered the opto-mechanical coupling and ignoring the Coulomb coupling, the output field can be given by

Then the behavior of the probe output field become the standard form of the double-EIT,[31] which is caused by the coupled opto-mechanical-induced transparency.[31, 32] Its real and imaginary parts are shown in Fig. 3. A new absorption peak appears inside the transparency window in Fig. 2(c) due to the effect of the opto-mechanical coupling. The double OMIT is presented due to quantum interference effects. The explanation of OEMIT can been given by the energy level configuration in Fig. 4. With the coupling of two cavities, the normal optical mode splits into two modes and the EIT-like window of the output field is established based on the destructive interference[38] as shown in Eq. (14). When the NMO is coupled to the second cavity via the opto-mechanical interaction, which is involved in the interference process, therefore the opto-mechanical interaction destroy the single EIT and splits one transparency window into two, i.e., two dips appear as shown in Fig. 3. The central peak is narrower than the both sides because of .

Fig. 3. The absorption Re (blue-solid line) and dispersion Im (red-dotted line) as a function of the detuning in the case of and the other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2(c).
Fig. 4. Energy level structure of the HOEMS. The number states of photons and phonons are denoted by Ni and ni, respectively. The tunneling coupling strength between and is J, and the effective opto-mechanical coupling strength between and is G. The Coulomb coupling strength between and is λ.

Moreover, when the NMO capacitively couples to the NMO by the Coulomb interaction, the output field is shown in Eq. (12). The absorption of the probe field versus the detuning and the Coulomb coupling strength λ is plotted in Fig. 5(a). With no the Coulomb coupling, the absorption of the probe field is just as Fig. 3 with the double OMIT. Considering the electrical coupling, we find that the triple-OMIT appears. The two-dimensional elevation diagram given in Fig. 5(b) with the corresponding to Fig. 5(a) shows clearly the change of the transparency window as the Coulomb coupling increases, i.e., the width of the central transparency window is significantly widened by the Coulomb coupling. The origin of the triple-OMIT can be explained by the level configuration in Fig. 4. We know that the double-OMIT arising from quantum interference is sensitive to phase disturbances due to the first NMO .[29, 31] The capacitive coupling between both NMOs not only gives an additionally degenerate level for identical NMOs, but also breaks down the symmetry of the double OMIT interference, and thereby produces a spectrally sharp bright resonance within the OMIT line shape.[29] Then the double OMIT transparency windows are split into triple transparency windows, which is an opto-electromechanically induced transparency, i.e., OEMIT. Moreover, for two different NMOs, the results will be slightly different from those above for identical NMOs.[29] Therefore, our scheme of the transparency window combines the advantages of the coupling-cavity, opto-mechanically and electromechanically induced transparency.

Fig. 5. The absorption as a function of the detuning and λ is plotted in panel (a) and the corresponding two-dimensional elevation diagram is given in panel (b), when the Coulomb interaction is added into the system. The other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 3.
4. Conclusion

In summary, we proposed a scheme to implement the manipulation of the opto-electromechanically induced transparency based on OMIT in a hybrid opto-electromechanical device composed of an FP cavity tunneling-coupled to a hybrid opto-electromechanical system. By studying the probe output field of the FP cavity, we found the OEMIT with the tunable multi-transparency windows. When the tunneling coupling is considered and the opto-mechanical coupling is negligible (g = 0) with the high quality opto-mechanical cavity , we can find a single coupled cavity-induced transparency, where the strong J and weak can enhance the width of the transparency window. Further, the Coulomb coupling is not added into the system considering the case of and , the output field gives the double OMIT with the single window split into two transparency windows due to the opto-mechanical coupling. Finally, the tunneling, opto-mechanical and Coulomb couplings are considered, the triple-OMIT appears with electromechanical induced an additional transparency window due to a degenerate level induced a new interference channel, where the width of transparency window can been widen by increasing λ. Therefore, by studying the effects of the different coupling parameters on the output field, we gave a scheme to modulate the number of transparency windows and its width. We believe that our results would be helpful for further understanding and applying quantum interference effects, especially, in the aspect of the integration quantum module device.

Reference
[1] Tufarelli T Ferraro A Serafini A Bose S Kim M S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 133605 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.133605
[2] Walther H Varcoe B T H Englert B G Becker T 2006 Rep. Prog. Phys. 69 1325 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/5/R02
[3] Rice P R Brecha R J 1996 Opt. Commun. 126 230 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(96)00102-2
[4] Boller K J Imamoğlu A Harris S E 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2593 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2593
[5] Wong V Boyd R Stroud C Bennink R Aronstein D Han P Q 2001 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference 65 30
[6] Nielsen A E B Kerckhoff J 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 043821 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043821
[7] Fleischhauer M Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5094
[8] Lukin M D Imamoğlu A 2001 Nature 413 273 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35095000
[9] Aspelmeyer M Kippenberg T J Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391
[10] Xiong H Wu Y 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 031305 https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5027122
[11] Agarwal G S Huang S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 041803 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.041803
[12] Weis S Riviere R Deleglise S Gavartin E Arcizet O Schliesser A Kippenberg T J 2010 Science 330 1520 https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1195596
[13] Safavi-Naeini A H Alegre T P M Chan J Eichenfield M Winger M Lin Q Hill J T Chang D Painter O 2011 Nature 472 69 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09933
[14] Hill J T Safavi-Naeini A H Chan J Painter O 2011 Nat. Commun. 3 1196 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2201
[15] Hammerer S K G Vanner M R Aspelmeyer M 2009 Nature 460 724 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08171
[16] Gigan S Böhm H R Paternostro M Blaser F Langer G Hertzberg J B Schwab K C Bäuerle D Aspelmeyer M Zeilinger A 2006 Nature 444 67 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05273
[17] Teufel J D Donner T Li D Harlow J W Allman M S Cicak K Sirois A J Whittaker J D Lehnert K W Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 475 359 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10261
[18] Reinhardt C Müller T Bourassa A Sankey J C 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6 021001
[19] Forstner S Prams S Knittel J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 120801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.120801
[20] Xiong H Si L G Wu Y 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 171102 https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4982167
[21] Xiong H Liu Z X Wu Y 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3630 https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.003630
[22] Dong C H Fiore V Kuzyk M C Wang H 2012 Science 338 1609 https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1228370
[23] Qin L G Wang Z Y Lin G W Zhao J Y Gong S Q 2016 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 52 9300106
[24] Qin L G Wang Z Y Ma H Y Wang H M Gong S Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 128502 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/26/12/128502
[25] Qin L G Wang Z Y Gong S Q Ma H Y 2017 Photon Res. 5 481 https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.5.000481
[26] Zhang Y Liu T Wu S Yu C 2018 Quantum. Inf. Process 17 209 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1980-0
[27] Liu Z X Wang B Kong C Xiong H Wu Y 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 111109 https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5019403
[28] Zhang X Y Zhou Y H Guo Y Q Yi X X 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 053802 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.053802
[29] Ma P C Zhang J Q Xiao Y Feng M Zhang 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 043825 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.043825
[30] Shahidani S Naderi M H Soltanolkotabi M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 053813 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053813
[31] Gu W J Yi Z 2014 Opt. Commun. 333 261 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2014.07.083
[32] Wu S C Qin L G Jing J Yang G H Wang Z Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 054203 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/25/5/054203
[33] Wang H Gu X Liu Y Miranowicz A Nori F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023817 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.023817
[34] Sohail A Zhang Y Zhang J Yu C S 2016 Sci. Rep. 62 8830 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28830
[35] Alotaibi H M M Sanders B C 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 021802 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.021802
[36] Hensinger W K Utami D W Goan H S Schwab K Monroe C Milburn G J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 041405 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.041405
[37] Jia W Z Wei L F Li Y Liu Y X 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 043843 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.043843
[38] Smith D D Chang H Fuller K A Rosenberger A T Boyd R W 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 063804 https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.063804